Comparing Hightouch with Weld
What is Hightouch
Pros
- Audience builder UI for non-technical users to create segments without SQL
- 70+ destinations, including CRMs, ad platforms, email & support tools
- No persistent data storage—fetches on-the-fly from your warehouse for security
- Support for real-time streaming and sub-minute latency syncs
- Granular field mapping and transformation via SQL or simple expressions
- Strong community, educational content, and responsive support
Cons
- Reverse ETL only—needs a separate ingestion tool
- Pricing based on rows/fields can become expensive at scale
- Destination API limits (e.g., Salesforce) can slow large syncs
- Custom connectors for very niche tools require waiting for team prioritization
- Non-engineers may still need data team to model data for complex use cases
Hightouch Product Description:
What I like about Hightouch
Hightouch is the easiest way to sync customer data into your tools like CRMs, email tools, and ad networks. Sync data from any source (warehouse, spreadsheets) to 70+ tools using SQL or a point-and-click UI without relying on Engineering.
What I dislike about Hightouch
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Hightouch vs Weld: Ease of Use and User Interface
Hightouch
Hightouch’s interface is modern and intuitive, with an audience builder that lets marketers define segments visually. Technical users can drop into SQL for precise control.
Weld
Weld is highly praised for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which allows even users with minimal SQL experience to manage data workflows efficiently. This makes it an excellent choice for smaller data teams or businesses without extensive technical resources.
Hightouch vs Weld: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Hightouch
Starts free for light use, but professional tiers scale with usage. For mid-market teams, the cost is justified by reduced engineering overhead, though very large sync volumes can be pricey.
Weld
Weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at $99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises.
Hightouch vs Weld: Comprehensive Feature Set
Hightouch
Reverse ETL features: audience builder, SQL-based syncs, incremental updates, dry-run mode, mapping templates, role-based access, real-time triggers, and CLI/API for GitOps. It covers most operational use cases—no ingestion layer included.
Weld
Weld integrates ELT, data transformations, and reverse ETL all within one platform. It also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an AI assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.
Hightouch vs Weld: Flexibility and Customization
Hightouch
Hightouch balances ease-of-use with flexibility: write custom SQL queries, adjust mappings, and schedule or trigger via API. It can cover custom use cases through webhooks or generic destinations, though some advanced scenarios may need engineering support.
Weld
Weld offers advanced SQL modeling and transformations directly within its platform with the help of AI, providing users with unparalleled control and flexibility over their data. Leveraging its powerful AI capabilities, Weld automates repetitive tasks and optimizes data workflows, allowing teams to focus on getting value and insights. Additionally, Weld's custom connector framework enables users to build connectors to any API, making it easy to integrate new data sources and tailor data pipelines to meet specific business needs. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for teams looking to customize their data integration processes extensively and maximize the utility of their data without needing external tools.
Summary of Hightouch vs Weld
| Weld | Hightouch | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectors | 200++ | 70+ |
| Price | $99 / Unlimited usage | Free tier; Growth ~$800+/mo based on rows/fields |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Location | EU | US |
| Extract data (ETL) | Yes | No |
| Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | Yes |
| Transformations | Yes | No |
| AI Assistant | Yes | No |
| On-Premise | No | No |
| Orchestration | Yes | Yes |
| Lineage | Yes | No |
| Version control | Yes | Yes |
| Load data to and from Excel | Yes | No |
| Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No |
| Two-Way Sync | Yes | No |
| dbt Core Integration | Yes | Yes |
| dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No |
| OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | Yes |
| G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.6 |
Conclusion
When comparing Hightouch and Weld, consider your primary requirements and budget:
- Hightouch excels at reverse etl features: audience builder, sql-based syncs, incremental updates, dry-run mode, mapping templates, role-based access, real-time triggers, and cli/api for gitops. it covers most operational use cases—no ingestion layer included.. If you need robust transformations and a wide connector catalogue with a strong focus on hightouch balances ease-of-use with flexibility: write custom sql queries, adjust mappings, and schedule or trigger via api. it can cover custom use cases through webhooks or generic destinations, though some advanced scenarios may need engineering support., this may be your best choice.
- Weld offers competitive pricing and weld is highly praised for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which allows even users with minimal sql experience to manage data workflows efficiently. this makes it an excellent choice for smaller data teams or businesses without extensive technical resources.. If you prioritize ease of setup, real-time syncing, or specific integrations, this tool could be a better fit.
