Comparing Rivery with Whatagraph and Weld



What is Rivery
Pros
- Supports custom integrations though native GUI
- Has reverse ETL option
- Supports Python
- Has data transformation capabilities
- Great customer support
Cons
- Lack of advanced error handling features
- Cannot transform data on the fly (ETL)
- Complex pricing model
- UI is lacking when working with larger complex pipelines
- Product documentation is lacking
As a user on G2 puts it::
What I like about Rivery
As a data analyst, I find the tool really easy to use; it's intuitive how you connect to the different data sources and create your data pipelines.
What I dislike about Rivery
What is Whatagraph
Pros
- Easy to use
- Visually appealing reports
- Great for agencies
- Great report automation
Cons
- Limited customization options for advanced users
- Expensive, particularly for smaller businesses
- Lacking integration coverage
- Steep learning curve
A reviewer on G2:
What I like about Whatagraph
Generating quality reports with ease is now possible thanks to this fantastic reporting tool. Moreover, our clients love the way we present the default menus which help save valuable time overall.
What I dislike about Whatagraph
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Rivery vs Whatagraph: Ease of Use and User Interface
Rivery
Rivery is known for its ease of use, especially for data analysts who need to connect different data sources and create pipelines quickly. Its intuitive GUI makes setup straightforward.
Whatagraph
Whatagraph is easy to use and great for generating visually appealing reports quickly, making it a popular choice for agencies and marketing teams.
Rivery vs Whatagraph: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Rivery
Rivery's pricing is complex and based on credits, which may not be straightforward for all users. Costs can rise significantly with increased data usage.
Whatagraph
Whatagraph is relatively expensive, particularly for smaller businesses, which may find its pricing a barrier to adoption.
Rivery vs Whatagraph: Comprehensive Feature Set
Rivery
The platform supports custom integrations, Python scripting, and reverse ETL, making it versatile for various data integration needs, but lacks on-the-fly transformation capabilities.
Whatagraph
The platform offers great report automation and integration with multiple marketing platforms, but it has limited customization options for advanced users.
Rivery vs Whatagraph: Flexibility and Customization
Rivery
Rivery offers flexibility in custom integrations and supports post-load transformations, but its user interface may lack robustness for managing larger, more complex pipelines.
Whatagraph
While Whatagraph is great for creating quick reports, it lacks flexibility and customization options, making it less suitable for advanced data tasks.
Summary of Rivery vs Whatagraph vs Weld
Weld | Rivery | Whatagraph | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 200++ | 200+ | 100+ |
Price | $99 / Unlimited usage | $0.75 per credit *100MB of data replication | $199 / month |
Free tier | No | Yes | No |
Location | EU | US | US |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | Yes | No |
Transformations | Yes | Yes | No |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
On-Premise | No | No | No |
Orchestration | Yes | No | No |
Lineage | Yes | No | No |
Version control | Yes | No | No |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | No | No |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | No |
dbt Core Integration | Yes | No | No |
dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | Yes | No |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing Rivery, Whatagraph, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- Rivery: the platform supports custom integrations, python scripting, and reverse etl, making it versatile for various data integration needs, but lacks on-the-fly transformation capabilities.. rivery's pricing is complex and based on credits, which may not be straightforward for all users. costs can rise significantly with increased data usage..
- Whatagraph: the platform offers great report automation and integration with multiple marketing platforms, but it has limited customization options for advanced users.. whatagraph is relatively expensive, particularly for smaller businesses, which may find its pricing a barrier to adoption..
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at $99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..