Comparing Qlik Replicate with SnapLogic and Weld



What is Qlik Replicate
Pros
- High-performance CDC with minimal source impact; supports heterogeneous sources and targets.
- Automated schema change handling—table/column additions in source auto-reflected in target.
- GUI-based configuration for tasks, monitoring dashboards, and robust error handling.
- Cloud-native or on-prem installations; integrates with Qlik’s broader ecosystem (e.g., Qlik Sense).
Cons
- No built-in ELT/transformations—only replication. Users need a separate tool for data transformations.
- Enterprise pricing (per-core licensing) can be high, particularly for large-scale replication across many tables.
- Learning curve for setting up advanced replication scenarios (e.g., multi-target replication, filters).
Qlik Replicate Documentation:
What I like about Qlik Replicate
Replicate’s CDC capabilities ensure minimal latency and zero-impact on source databases. Schema changes in the source are automatically captured and propagated to targets.
What I dislike about Qlik Replicate
Licensing is expensive, and it’s focused solely on replication (no transformations). For broader ETL, additional tools are needed.
What is SnapLogic
Pros
- 500+ Snap connectors covering SaaS, databases, big data, and on-prem sources.
- Visual pipeline designer (Snap Studio) with AI-driven suggestions (Iris) for mapping and transformations.
- Serverless execution with autoscaling and multi-cloud support (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Supports real-time streaming (buses), batch, and IoT/edge integrations.
Cons
- Premium pricing (connector-based, usage-based) can be cost-prohibitive for SMBs.
- Designer interface can become cluttered when pipelines grow large; performance may degrade.
- Limited offline or self-hosted options; fully SaaS-based.
SnapLogic Documentation:
What I like about SnapLogic
SnapLogic’s Iris AI recommendations help build pipelines faster—very helpful for common transformations and connector configurations.
What I dislike about SnapLogic
Pricing is high; smaller teams may not need such a large connector catalog. The UI can be overwhelming with very large pipelines.
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Qlik Replicate vs SnapLogic: Ease of Use and User Interface
Qlik Replicate
The Qlik Replicate UI provides wizards to create replication tasks quickly, monitors latency and throughput, and auto-detects schema changes. Setup for common CDC tasks is straightforward, but advanced filtering and tuning require expertise.
SnapLogic
SnapLogic’s Snap Studio is a React-based canvas where users drag Snaps (pre-built connectors or transforms) into pipelines. Iris AI suggests mappings and transformations, reducing manual work. However, very large pipelines can slow down.
Qlik Replicate vs SnapLogic: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Qlik Replicate
The licensing model is per-engine/core, often starting at $50k+/year for smaller environments. While expensive, the high reliability and low-latency replication justify cost for mission-critical use cases.
SnapLogic
SnapLogic’s pricing is typically $50k+ per year for moderate usage; connectors and runtime costs can add up. Large enterprises benefit from the wide connector catalog and AI features, but SMBs may find it expensive relative to needs.
Qlik Replicate vs SnapLogic: Comprehensive Feature Set
Qlik Replicate
Features: CDC-based replication, automated schema drift handling, support for 100+ sources/targets (databases, mainframes, cloud), multi-target replication, and basic transformations (e.g., data type conversions). No deep transformation engine.
SnapLogic
Features include: over 500 Snaps, real-time streaming, batch pipelines, AI-driven pipeline recommendations, multi-cloud deployment, built-in data quality, API management, and robust monitoring/alerting.
Qlik Replicate vs SnapLogic: Flexibility and Customization
Qlik Replicate
Users can configure advanced mapping rules, filters, and transformations (limited) via the UI or JSON configs. For deeper transforms, integrate with Qlik Compose or third-party ETL. Qlik Replicate can be automated via CLI and REST API.
SnapLogic
SnapLogic allows custom Snaps to be written in Node.js or Python, enabling bespoke connectors or transforms. Pipelines can be parameterized, embedded into CI/CD, and triggered via REST APIs. However, no self-hosted runtime—is fully SaaS.
Summary of Qlik Replicate vs SnapLogic vs Weld
Weld | Qlik Replicate | SnapLogic | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 200+ | 100+ | 500+ |
Price | €99 / 2 connectors | Subscription/perpetual license (custom quotes; six-figure enterprise costs) | Subscription (connector & usage-based; starts ~$50k/year) |
Free tier | No | No | No |
Location | EU | King of Prussia, PA, USA (Qlik HQ) | San Mateo, CA, USA |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | No | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No | Yes |
Transformations | Yes | No | Yes |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | Yes |
On-Premise | No | Yes | No |
Orchestration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Lineage | Yes | No | Yes |
Version control | Yes | No | Yes |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | No | Yes |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | Yes |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | Yes |
dbt Core Integration | Yes | No | No |
dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | Yes | Yes |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.7 | 4.4 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing Qlik Replicate, SnapLogic, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- Qlik Replicate: features: cdc-based replication, automated schema drift handling, support for 100+ sources/targets (databases, mainframes, cloud), multi-target replication, and basic transformations (e.g., data type conversions). no deep transformation engine. . the licensing model is per-engine/core, often starting at $50k+/year for smaller environments. while expensive, the high reliability and low-latency replication justify cost for mission-critical use cases. .
- SnapLogic: features include: over 500 snaps, real-time streaming, batch pipelines, ai-driven pipeline recommendations, multi-cloud deployment, built-in data quality, api management, and robust monitoring/alerting. . snaplogic’s pricing is typically $50k+ per year for moderate usage; connectors and runtime costs can add up. large enterprises benefit from the wide connector catalog and ai features, but smbs may find it expensive relative to needs. .
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at €99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..