Comparing Portable.io with Skyvia and Weld



What is Portable.io
Pros
- Unmatched connector breadth: 1,000+ connectors for niche and popular sources
- On-demand custom connector development at no additional cost
- Flat per-connector pricing; no volume-based fees
- Fully managed - Portable handles API changes, schema updates, and pipeline maintenance
- Set-and-forget simplicity with minimal configuration needed
Cons
- EL-only (no in-platform transformations)
- Cloud-only SaaS (no on-prem option)
- No reverse ETL or activation features—it only loads to warehouses
- Some new connectors may require initial tuning if usage is low until fully hardened
- Limited scheduling granularity (mostly daily or on-demand syncs out of the box)
G2 Review:
What I like about Portable.io
They have excellent support and communication in both timelines and quality of response.
What I dislike about Portable.io
There is a learning curve that can take some time to leverage more complex transformations and the support is limited with highly complex setups leaving some aspects of development more difficult.
What is Skyvia
Pros
- Fast, no-code setup for loading data from 70+ sources to warehouses or cloud DBs.
- Handles incremental loads and can auto-detect schema changes for many sources.
- Built-in data replication (one-way sync) and backup options for cloud data.
- Free tier available (limited rows and sources) for basic usage.
Cons
- No advanced transformation engine—only simple filters, mappings, and formula fields.
- Pricing based on rows and connectors; high-volume loads can be costly.
- Support and community resources are limited compared to major ETL vendors.
G2 Reviews:
What I like about Skyvia
It just makes pulling Facebook Ads data into Snowflake so much smoother. The whole integration is pretty seamless: it's like we’ve got all our data in one spot now.
What I dislike about Skyvia
While Skyvia is powerful, sometimes more advanced transformation scenarios require workarounds or can't be fully implemented within the visual designer.
What is Weld
Pros
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- ETL + reverse ETL in one
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- Flat monthly pricing model
- 200+ connectors (Shopify, HubSpot, etc.)
- AI assistant
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
- Focused on cloud data warehouses
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Ease of Use & Interface
Portable.io
Portable’s interface is minimalistic—users pick a source, enter credentials, and choose a destination. It’s extremely easy for non-technical users to onboard new connectors.
Skyvia
Skyvia’s wizard-driven UI guides users through connecting source and destination, selecting objects, and scheduling. For basic use cases, it’s extremely quick. Complex pipelines aren’t its focus.
Pricing & Affordability
Portable.io
Portable’s per-connector flat pricing makes costs predictable and often more affordable for companies with many small-volume sources, compared to volume-based models.
Skyvia
Free tier allows up to 5000 rows/day. Paid plans start at $15/month for 10k rows plus $15 per additional 10k rows. For large-scale or continuous replication, costs scale accordingly.
Feature Set
Portable.io
Focus on broad source coverage and reliability: over 1,000 connectors, incremental syncs, schema change handling, and managed maintenance. It does not provide transformations or reverse ETL, assuming those happen downstream.
Skyvia
Supports: one-time or scheduled imports/exports, incremental loads (via key-based changes), data backup/restore, and firewall-friendly connectors. No transformations beyond mappings/filters.
Flexibility & Customization
Portable.io
While there is no in-platform coding, Portable’s on-demand connector dev ensures virtually any source can be supported. Users trade transformation flexibility for maximum connector coverage and simplicity.
Skyvia
Users can define simple formulas for fields (e.g., concatenation). For advanced transformations, they need external tools (e.g., dbt) after loading. No support for scripting within ETL.
Summary of Portable.io vs Skyvia vs Weld
Weld | Portable.io | Skyvia | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 200+ | 1000+ | 70+ |
Price | $79 / 5M Active Rows | Flat per connector (no volume fees) | Free (limited); paid plans from $15/month for 10k rows |
Free tier | No | Yes | Yes |
Location | EU | US | San Francisco, CA, USA |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No | No |
Transformations | Yes | No | No |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
On-Premise | No | No | No |
Orchestration | Yes | No | Yes |
Lineage | Yes | No | No |
Version control | Yes | No | No |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | No | Yes |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | No |
dbt Core Integration | Yes | No | No |
dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | Yes | No |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing Portable.io, Skyvia, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- Portable.io: focus on broad source coverage and reliability: over 1,000 connectors, incremental syncs, schema change handling, and managed maintenance. it does not provide transformations or reverse etl, assuming those happen downstream.. portable’s per-connector flat pricing makes costs predictable and often more affordable for companies with many small-volume sources, compared to volume-based models..
- Skyvia: supports: one-time or scheduled imports/exports, incremental loads (via key-based changes), data backup/restore, and firewall-friendly connectors. no transformations beyond mappings/filters. . free tier allows up to 5000 rows/day. paid plans start at $15/month for 10k rows plus $15 per additional 10k rows. for large-scale or continuous replication, costs scale accordingly. .
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at $79 for 5 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..