Comparing MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) with Portable.io and Weld



What is MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform)
Pros
- Extensive connectivity: 150+ enterprise-grade connectors (SaaS, databases, protocols, mainframes)
- Hybrid deployment: fully on-prem, private cloud, or CloudHub managed runtime
- Powerful DataWeave language for complex transformations
- API-led architecture supporting real-time APIs and batch ETL/ELT in the same platform
- Enterprise-grade reliability: high throughput, clustering, transactions, and monitoring
- Rich tooling: Anypoint Studio (IDE), API Manager, Exchange for reusable assets
Cons
- High complexity and steep learning curve—requires experienced integration developers
- Expensive licensing (vCore-based), typically suited for large enterprises
- Not focused on out-of-the-box simplicity—each pipeline is effectively a development project
- Maintenance overhead when self-hosted; even CloudHub needs ongoing ops for flow logic
- UI/IDE can feel dated and resource-intensive compared to modern low-code ETL tools
Tech Lead at a Financial Services Firm (G2 Review summary):
What I like about MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform)
MuleSoft’s Anypoint Platform offers 100+ pre-built connectors and a powerful integration engine. It’s an enterprise integration solution that supports batch ETL as well as real-time API integrations, making it possible to connect virtually any system.
What I dislike about MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform)
What is Portable.io
Pros
- Unmatched connector breadth: 1,000+ connectors for niche and popular sources
- On-demand custom connector development at no additional cost
- Flat per-connector pricing; no volume-based fees
- Fully managed – Portable handles API changes, schema updates, and pipeline maintenance
- Set-and-forget simplicity with minimal configuration needed
Cons
- EL-only (no in-platform transformations)
- Cloud-only SaaS (no on-prem option)
- No reverse ETL or activation features—it only loads to warehouses
- Some new connectors may require initial tuning if usage is low until fully hardened
- Limited scheduling granularity (mostly daily or on-demand syncs out of the box)
Portable Connector Catalog:
What I like about Portable.io
Portable focuses on the hard-to-find ETL connectors that you can’t find elsewhere. Our specialty is niche tools… If you can’t find the connector you need, we’ll build it on-demand for you.
What I dislike about Portable.io
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) vs Portable.io: Ease of Use and User Interface
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform)
MuleSoft is a developer-centric platform with Anypoint Studio as an Eclipse-based IDE. It is powerful but not plug-and-play; teams need formal training and strong integration expertise to use it effectively.
Portable.io
Portable’s interface is minimalistic—users pick a source, enter credentials, and choose a destination. It’s extremely easy for non-technical users to onboard new connectors.
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) vs Portable.io: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform)
MuleSoft is among the most expensive integration platforms. Pricing is based on the number of vCores and features, making it a significant investment reserved for large enterprises with complex integration needs.
Portable.io
Portable’s per-connector flat pricing makes costs predictable and often more affordable for companies with many small-volume sources, compared to volume-based models.
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) vs Portable.io: Comprehensive Feature Set
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform)
Extensive feature set: batch and streaming ETL, real-time API creation, ESB, DataWeave transformations, API management, message queuing, hybrid deployment, high availability, and robust monitoring. Essentially, MuleSoft can serve as ETL, ESB, and API gateway in one.
Portable.io
Focus on broad source coverage and reliability: over 1,000 connectors, incremental syncs, schema change handling, and managed maintenance. It does not provide transformations or reverse ETL, assuming those happen downstream.
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) vs Portable.io: Flexibility and Customization
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform)
MuleSoft is highly flexible: you can extend connectors, write custom DataWeave scripts, embed custom Java code, and orchestrate complex multi-system transactions. The platform can be tailored to virtually any integration requirement but demands developer resources.
Portable.io
While there is no in-platform coding, Portable’s on-demand connector dev ensures virtually any source can be supported. Users trade transformation flexibility for maximum connector coverage and simplicity.
Summary of MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) vs Portable.io vs Weld
Weld | MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) | Portable.io | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 200+ | 150+ | 1000+ |
Price | €99 / 2 connectors | Enterprise vCore subscription—high-end (six-figure annual) | Flat per connector (no volume fees) |
Free tier | No | No | Yes |
Location | EU | US | US |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | Yes | No |
Transformations | Yes | Yes | No |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
On-Premise | No | Yes | No |
Orchestration | Yes | Yes | No |
Lineage | Yes | Yes | No |
Version control | Yes | Yes | No |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | No | No |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | Yes | No |
dbt Core Integration | Yes | No | No |
dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | Yes | Yes |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.8 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform), Portable.io, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform): extensive feature set: batch and streaming etl, real-time api creation, esb, dataweave transformations, api management, message queuing, hybrid deployment, high availability, and robust monitoring. essentially, mulesoft can serve as etl, esb, and api gateway in one.. mulesoft is among the most expensive integration platforms. pricing is based on the number of vcores and features, making it a significant investment reserved for large enterprises with complex integration needs..
- Portable.io: focus on broad source coverage and reliability: over 1,000 connectors, incremental syncs, schema change handling, and managed maintenance. it does not provide transformations or reverse etl, assuming those happen downstream.. portable’s per-connector flat pricing makes costs predictable and often more affordable for companies with many small-volume sources, compared to volume-based models..
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at €99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..