Comparing Google Cloud Dataflow with Jitterbit and Weld
Carolina Russ6 min read
What is Google Cloud Dataflow
Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully managed stream and batch processing service based on Apache Beam. It enables users to write ETL pipelines in Java or Python, which Dataflow executes on Google’s serverless infrastructure with autoscaling. It integrates natively with Pub/Sub, BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and other GCP services for end-to-end data processing.
Pros
- Unified batch + streaming model via Apache Beam SDK (Java/Python).
- Serverless autoscaling with dynamic work rebalancing for cost and performance optimization.
- First-class integration with GCP services: Pub/Sub, BigQuery I/O connectors, Cloud Storage, Spanner, etc.
- Built-in exactly-once processing semantics and windowing capabilities for streaming ETL.
Cons
- Steep learning curve if unfamiliar with Apache Beam’s abstractions (PCollections, DoFns, pipelines).
- Monitoring and debugging streaming pipelines can be complex—metrics and logs often require cross-referencing.
- Cost can rise quickly for large-scale streaming (billed per vCPU-second and memory). Efficient pipeline tuning is critical.
Cloud Dataflow Documentation:
What I like about Google Cloud Dataflow
Dataflow’s unified model for batch and streaming simplifies pipeline development—write once and choose your execution mode. Autoscaling and dynamic work rebalancing ensure efficient resource use.
What I dislike about Google Cloud Dataflow
Debugging streaming jobs can be challenging; understanding Apache Beam semantics is essential. Costs can spike if pipelines aren’t carefully tuned.
What is Jitterbit
Jitterbit Harmony is a cloud-based integration platform that supports ETL, API integration, and application connectivity. Its core concept is “Harmony Cloud Integration,” where users design “Jitterpaks” (integration packages) via a visual interface. Jitterbit offers pre-built connectors to major SaaS apps (Salesforce, NetSuite), on-prem databases, and flat files. It also supports real-time API creation from data sources and transformation using SQL or scripting.
Pros
- Pre-built connectors for CRM, ERP, databases, and flat files; plus the ability to build custom connectors via SDK.
- API creation feature: turn data flows into REST or SOAP endpoints on the fly.
- Visual Studio for designing Jitterpaks (pipelines), with drag-and-drop mapping and transformation steps.
- Real-time and batch modes supported; can deploy on Jitterbit’s cloud or your own servers (hybrid).
Cons
- Complex licensing (based on endpoints, environments, and usage) can be expensive for heavy data volumes.
- Studio interface can feel less modern compared to newer iPaaS; large, complex flows can become unwieldy.
- Some advanced transformations require writing custom code rather than purely using GUI.
Jitterbit Harmony Overview:
What I like about Jitterbit
Jitterbit’s Studio UI makes building integrations straightforward, and the API creation feature lets us expose data to external apps quickly.
What I dislike about Jitterbit
Pricing is tiered and can be high as you add more endpoints or data volume. Complex transformations sometimes require scripting, despite the low-code interface.
What is Weld
Weld is a powerful ETL platform that seamlessly integrates ELT, data transformations, reverse ETL, and AI-assisted features into one user-friendly solution. With its intuitive interface, Weld makes it easy for anyone, regardless of technical expertise, to build and manage data workflows. Known for its premium quality connectors, all built in-house, Weld ensures the highest quality and reliability for its users. It is designed to handle large datasets with near real-time data synchronization, making it ideal for modern data teams that require robust and efficient data integration solutions. Weld also leverages AI to automate repetitive tasks, optimize workflows, and enhance data transformation capabilities, ensuring maximum efficiency and productivity. Users can combine data from a wide variety of sources, including marketing platforms, CRMs, e-commerce platforms like Shopify, APIs, databases, Excel, Google Sheets, and more, providing a single source of truth for all their data.
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Google Cloud Dataflow vs Jitterbit: Ease of Use and User Interface
Google Cloud Dataflow
Dataflow pipelines are defined programmatically in Java or Python (Apache Beam). There is no drag-and-drop UI; developers use the Cloud Console or CLI to monitor, but pipeline creation and debugging happen in code and SDKs.
Jitterbit
Jitterbit’s Studio is a Java-based desktop application (also has a web version) with a canvas for designing operations. It supports mapping between schemas, scripting for complex logic, and testing within the UI. Some users find it less responsive for very large flows.
Google Cloud Dataflow vs Jitterbit: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Google Cloud Dataflow
Charges for each pipeline based on vCPU-second, memory, and persistent disk usage. Streaming jobs are billed continuously. Without careful optimization (autoscaling, batching), costs can escalate. However, for high-throughput workloads, serverless autoscaling can be cost-effective versus self-managed clusters.
Jitterbit
Pricing depends on number of endpoints, environments (dev/test/prod), and data volume. Smaller teams might start around $25k/year, but enterprise usage can cost significantly more.
Google Cloud Dataflow vs Jitterbit: Comprehensive Feature Set
Google Cloud Dataflow
Features include: Batch & streaming unified model, windowing & triggers, exactly-once semantics, dynamic work rebalancing, and data-driven autoscaling. Supports FlexRS (spot pricing for batch) and integration with Dataflow SQL for SQL-based pipelines.
Jitterbit
Features include: ETL/ELT pipelines, API generation, cloud & on-prem deployment, real-time event triggers, pre-built templates (“Jitterpaks”), and monitoring dashboards. Also supports multi-environment promotion and CI/CD.
Google Cloud Dataflow vs Jitterbit: Flexibility and Customization
Google Cloud Dataflow
Users write custom transforms (ParDo, Map, GroupBy), can integrate UDFs, and use side inputs. Complex workloads requiring custom logic (stateful processing, custom connectors) are fully supported via Beam SDK. Cloud features like VPC, IAM, and KMS integrate security.
Jitterbit
Users can embed JavaScript or VBScript for transformations. Jitterbit’s SDK allows building custom connectors. While hybrid deployment is possible, full feature access often requires cloud usage.
Summary of Google Cloud Dataflow vs Jitterbit vs Weld
| Weld | Google Cloud Dataflow | Jitterbit | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectors | 200+ | 30+ | 100+ |
| Price | €99 / 2 connectors | Per vCPU-second ($0.0106/vCPU-minute) + RAM and storage; streaming pipelines incur additional costs | Subscription-based (custom quotes; starts ~$25k/year) |
| Free tier | No | No | No |
| Location | EU | GCP Global (multi-region) | Oakland, CA, USA |
| Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No | Yes |
| Transformations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
| On-Premise | No | No | Yes |
| Orchestration | Yes | No | Yes |
| Lineage | Yes | No | No |
| Version control | Yes | No | Yes |
| Load data to and from Excel | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
| Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | Yes |
| dbt Core Integration | Yes | No | No |
| dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
| OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | No | Yes |
| G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing Google Cloud Dataflow, Jitterbit, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- Google Cloud Dataflow: features include: batch & streaming unified model, windowing & triggers, exactly-once semantics, dynamic work rebalancing, and data-driven autoscaling. supports flexrs (spot pricing for batch) and integration with dataflow sql for sql-based pipelines. . charges for each pipeline based on vcpu-second, memory, and persistent disk usage. streaming jobs are billed continuously. without careful optimization (autoscaling, batching), costs can escalate. however, for high-throughput workloads, serverless autoscaling can be cost-effective versus self-managed clusters. .
- Jitterbit: features include: etl/elt pipelines, api generation, cloud & on-prem deployment, real-time event triggers, pre-built templates (“jitterpaks”), and monitoring dashboards. also supports multi-environment promotion and ci/cd. . pricing depends on number of endpoints, environments (dev/test/prod), and data volume. smaller teams might start around $25k/year, but enterprise usage can cost significantly more. .
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at €99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..
