Comparing FME with Pentaho Data Integration and Weld



What is FME
Pros
- Supports 450+ data formats, making it ideal for GIS and non-GIS integration.
- Graphical Workspaces with extensive transformer library for spatial (coordinate reprojection, topology) and non-spatial transformations (joins, data cleansing).
- FME Server enables automated scheduling, breakout clustered processing, and REST API for triggering workflows.
- Strong data validation and quality features—users can apply conditional checks and notifications when data doesn’t meet criteria.
Cons
- High licensing costs for desktop (FME Desktop) and server components; often priced per core for server deployments.
- Primarily geared toward GIS/spatial use cases; non-spatial ETL use is possible but the interface and transformers are optimized for spatial workflows.
- Large learning curve for complex workspaces—dragging many transformers can become unwieldy visually.
FME Product Overview:
What I like about FME
FME’s ability to handle complex spatial transformations and 450+ formats is unmatched. The drag-and-drop workspace builder drastically speeds up geospatial ETL.
What I dislike about FME
Licensing can be expensive for smaller organizations. Focus on spatial means some general ETL features are less polished than GIS-specific functions.
What is Pentaho Data Integration
Pros
- Open-source (Community Edition) with no licensing costs; Enterprise Edition provides additional features and support.
- 150+ connectors (databases, cloud storage, big data, files, NoSQL) and flexible step-based transformations.
- Graphical Spoon interface for visual ETL job design; transformations can be previewed and tested in real-time.
- Support for clustered execution (Carte server) for parallel processing and higher throughput.
Cons
- Community Edition lacks advanced features (lineage, data quality, enterprise monitoring), requiring Enterprise Edition for production readiness.
- Performance can suffer with very large data volumes if not properly tuned (Java memory, clustering).
- User interface and user experience are dated compared to newer cloud-native ETL tools.
Pentaho Data Integration Overview:
What I like about Pentaho Data Integration
PDI’s free community edition and Spoon GUI allow rapid ETL prototyping; its step library is extensive, and clustering support is solid for scale.
What I dislike about Pentaho Data Integration
Limited data quality features and slower development speed compared to modern cloud ETL. Community support can be slow for fixes.
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Ease of Use & Interface
FME
FME’s Workbench is a desktop application where users connect Reader and Writer transformers to map and transform data. While powerful for spatial, the GUI can feel cluttered for workflows with hundreds of transformers.
Pentaho Data Integration
Pentaho’s Spoon GUI uses a canvas paradigm: drag "steps" onto a transformation, connect them, and configure. While powerful, it can feel clunky, especially for very complex flows with many steps.
Pricing & Affordability
FME
FME Desktop licenses start around $2,000/year. FME Server pricing is per-core (often $20k+/core for an annual license). Expensive for small teams, but justified where spatial data integration is critical.
Pentaho Data Integration
The free Community Edition is attractive for experimentation. Enterprise Edition pricing is usage-based and includes support, lineag, and more; typically suited for mid-sized to large organizations.
Feature Set
FME
Supports reading/writing 450+ formats (GIS, CAD, JSON, XML, databases), transformer library (spatial & non-spatial), workflow orchestration via FME Server, automation (event-based, scheduled), and REST API endpoints for triggering.
Pentaho Data Integration
PDI features: GUI-based transformation designer, job orchestration, data cleansing, lookups, joins, scripting (JavaScript, PDI’s built-in “User Defined Java Expression”), logging, clustering, and integration with Pentaho BI for reporting. Lineage and monitoring in Enterprise.
Flexibility & Customization
FME
Users can embed Python, R, or Shell scripts within transformers for custom logic. FME Server can be deployed in any environment (on-prem, AWS, Azure) and scaled horizontally. However, no built-in data catalog or lineage; separate tools needed.
Pentaho Data Integration
Users can embed Java, JavaScript, or invoke external scripts. PDI’s open architecture allows custom plugins for new steps/connectors. The code is open-source, so full extensibility is available, though it requires Java development.
Summary of FME vs Pentaho Data Integration vs Weld
Weld | FME | Pentaho Data Integration | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 200+ | 450+ | 150+ |
Price | $79 / No data volume limits | Per-seat for FME Desktop ($2,000+/year) and per-core for FME Server (custom) | Community Edition: Free; Enterprise Edition: Custom pricing |
Free tier | No | No | Yes |
Location | EU | Surrey, BC, Canada (Safe Software HQ) | Santa Clara, CA, USA (Hitachi Vantara HQ) |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No | No |
Transformations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
On-Premise | No | Yes | Yes |
Orchestration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Lineage | Yes | No | Yes |
Version control | Yes | No | Yes |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | Yes |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | No |
dbt Core Integration | Yes | No | No |
dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | Yes | No |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.7 | 4.1 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing FME, Pentaho Data Integration, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- FME: supports reading/writing 450+ formats (gis, cad, json, xml, databases), transformer library (spatial & non-spatial), workflow orchestration via fme server, automation (event-based, scheduled), and rest api endpoints for triggering. . fme desktop licenses start around $2,000/year. fme server pricing is per-core (often $20k+/core for an annual license). expensive for small teams, but justified where spatial data integration is critical. .
- Pentaho Data Integration: pdi features: gui-based transformation designer, job orchestration, data cleansing, lookups, joins, scripting (javascript, pdi’s built-in “user defined java expression”), logging, clustering, and integration with pentaho bi for reporting. lineage and monitoring in enterprise. . the free community edition is attractive for experimentation. enterprise edition pricing is usage-based and includes support, lineag, and more; typically suited for mid-sized to large organizations. .
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at $99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..