Comparing Etlworks Integrator with Weld
What is Etlworks Integrator
Pros
- 300+ connectors for databases, cloud storage, SaaS apps, and streaming platforms.
- Supports both batch and streaming (CDC) with configurable schedules and triggers.
- Transformations via SQL, JavaScript, or built-in functions; data validation and error-handling features.
- Cloud-based with on-prem runtime options for connecting to internal resources securely.
Cons
- UI complexity: designing flows with many steps can be difficult to navigate.
- Subscription is credit-based (e.g., $0.10/credit), making cost estimation tricky for variable workloads.
- Less brand recognition and community support compared to leading ETL tools.
Etlworks Integrator Features:
What I like about Etlworks Integrator
Etlworks Integrator’s breadth of connectors and flexible transformation engine (SQL/JavaScript) let us integrate data from dozens of sources quickly.
What I dislike about Etlworks Integrator
The UI can be overwhelming for beginners, and pricing (credit-based) can be hard to predict for varying workloads.
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Etlworks Integrator vs Weld: Ease of Use and User Interface
Etlworks Integrator
Etlworks Integrator’s Flow Designer uses a canvas with source, transformation, and destination steps. While powerful and flexible, the interface has a steep learning curve; nested steps and branching can become difficult to visualize.
Weld
Weld is highly praised for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which allows even users with minimal SQL experience to manage data workflows efficiently. This makes it an excellent choice for smaller data teams or businesses without extensive technical resources.
Etlworks Integrator vs Weld: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Etlworks Integrator
Charges are based on credits consumed by data volume and transformations. Free trial provides limited credits. For predictable workloads, budget forecasting requires careful usage analysis.
Weld
Weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at $99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises.
Etlworks Integrator vs Weld: Comprehensive Feature Set
Etlworks Integrator
Features include: 300+ connectors, CDC replication, batch/streaming pipelines, SQL/JavaScript transformations, error handling, scheduling, and secure on-prem gateways. Also supports webhooks and REST API triggers.
Weld
Weld integrates ELT, data transformations, and reverse ETL all within one platform. It also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an AI assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.
Etlworks Integrator vs Weld: Flexibility and Customization
Etlworks Integrator
Supports embedding custom JavaScript or calling external services within pipelines. Can deploy integration nodes on-premise to access internal networks. Pipelines can be exported/imported for version control.
Weld
Weld offers advanced SQL modeling and transformations directly within its platform with the help of AI, providing users with unparalleled control and flexibility over their data. Leveraging its powerful AI capabilities, Weld automates repetitive tasks and optimizes data workflows, allowing teams to focus on getting value and insights. Additionally, Weld's custom connector framework enables users to build connectors to any API, making it easy to integrate new data sources and tailor data pipelines to meet specific business needs. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for teams looking to customize their data integration processes extensively and maximize the utility of their data without needing external tools.
Summary of Etlworks Integrator vs Weld
| Weld | Etlworks Integrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectors | 200++ | 300+ |
| Price | $99 / Unlimited usage | Credit-based (e.g., $0.10/credit; volume discounts available) |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Location | EU | Pittsburgh, PA, USA |
| Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes |
| Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No |
| Transformations | Yes | Yes |
| AI Assistant | Yes | No |
| On-Premise | No | Yes |
| Orchestration | Yes | Yes |
| Lineage | Yes | No |
| Version control | Yes | No |
| Load data to and from Excel | Yes | Yes |
| Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | Yes |
| Two-Way Sync | Yes | No |
| dbt Core Integration | Yes | No |
| dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No |
| OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | Yes |
| G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.5 |
Conclusion
When comparing Etlworks Integrator and Weld, consider your primary requirements and budget:
- Etlworks Integrator excels at features include: 300+ connectors, cdc replication, batch/streaming pipelines, sql/javascript transformations, error handling, scheduling, and secure on-prem gateways. also supports webhooks and rest api triggers. . If you need robust transformations and a wide connector catalogue with a strong focus on supports embedding custom javascript or calling external services within pipelines. can deploy integration nodes on-premise to access internal networks. pipelines can be exported/imported for version control. , this may be your best choice.
- Weld offers competitive pricing and weld is highly praised for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which allows even users with minimal sql experience to manage data workflows efficiently. this makes it an excellent choice for smaller data teams or businesses without extensive technical resources.. If you prioritize ease of setup, real-time syncing, or specific integrations, this tool could be a better fit.
