Comparing Databox with Fivetran and Weld
The future of data is here: effortlessly gather all your data in one place and use AI to drive insights.
No credit card required.

What is Databox
Pros
- Easy to use
- Powerful features
- Great customer support
- Comprehensive data visualization
- Real-time data updates
Cons
- Expensive
- Limited customization
- Lack of advanced features
- Limited drill-down capabilities
A reviewer on Capterra:
What I like about Databox
Databox is always looking for ways to improve its interface. It's smooth - data updates quickly and it's easy to use. The customer service is super responsive, and always willing to step in and help out with the Databoards (dashboards) I'm working on. I would say it is my favorite tool to use as an analyst - ever!
What I dislike about Databox
Still missing some more obscure, less popular, integrations.
What is Fivetran
Pros
- Wide variety of connectors
- Easy setup, low maintenance, and scalability with pre-built connectors
- Robust security protocols
- Detailed and helpful documentation
- Near real-time replication capabilities
Cons
- Depends on external tools for data transformations (e.g., DBT)
- No built-in reverse ETL capabilities
- Complex and expensive pricing model
- Limited flexibility for data transformations
- No AI assistant or advanced automation features
From a review on G2:
What I like about Fivetran
The pre-built connectors makes data integration super easy, without the need of an expensive data engineering team. If you are using DBT, there is a DBT package for most of the pre-built connectors that will provide configurable data marts/models.
What I dislike about Fivetran
New connectors are released infrequently, and pricing is somewhat opaque if you are not familiar. It is somewhat opinionated, so if you are not already using a modern data stack w. their preferred partners it's a bit harder to integrate.
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Databox vs Fivetran: Ease of Use and User Interface
Databox
Databox is easy to use with a smooth interface and real-time data updates, making it a favorite among analysts for data visualization and reporting.
Fivetran
While Fivetran offers a comprehensive set of connectors, it requires more technical knowledge, especially for setting up and managing data transformations, as it relies on external tools like DBT.
Databox vs Fivetran: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Databox
Databox is on the pricier side, which might deter smaller businesses or startups with limited budgets, despite its robust features and customer support.
Fivetran
Fivetran’s pricing can be quite complex and increases significantly with the volume of data, making it potentially expensive for growing companies or those with large datasets. This can be a disadvantage for teams looking for a cost-effective solution.
Databox vs Fivetran: Comprehensive Feature Set
Databox
The platform offers powerful data visualization tools and comprehensive dashboards, but lacks advanced features and customization options, which could be limiting for some users.
Fivetran
Although Fivetran excels in ELT capabilities and offers near real-time data replication, it lacks built-in reverse ETL and advanced transformation features. Users must depend on third-party tools for data transformation, adding to the complexity and cost.
Databox vs Fivetran: Flexibility and Customization
Databox
Databox provides a range of data visualization tools, but customization is limited, particularly for more complex reporting and analysis needs.
Fivetran
With Fivetran, the ability to transform data is more limited and often requires additional tools like DBT, which adds layers of complexity and can slow down the process for users who need quick and easy data manipulation.
Summary of Databox vs Fivetran vs Weld
Weld | Databox | Fivetran | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 150+ | 100+ | 500+ |
Price | $99 / 2 connectors | $47 / month - 3 sources, 5 users | $1,052 / 2M Active Rows |
Free tier | No | Yes | Yes |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No | No |
Version control | Yes | No | No |
Orchestration | Yes | No | No |
Lineage | Yes | No | No |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | No | No |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | No |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Conclusion
When comparing Fivetran and Weld, Weld emerges as a more cost-effective and efficient platform, particularly for businesses looking to save on operational costs and minimize the need for large data engineering teams. Weld offers all the capabilities of Fivetran, including ELT, data transformations, and reverse ETL, but with significantly less manpower required to manage and maintain data workflows. Weld’s all-in-one solution, enhanced by its advanced AI capabilities, automates repetitive tasks, optimizes data workflows, and reduces the need for extensive manual intervention. This automation not only streamlines processes but also cuts down on the high costs associated with managing large volumes of data and employing a large data engineering team. Furthermore, Weld's straightforward and affordable pricing model makes it an attractive option for companies aiming to manage their data more efficiently and economically. In contrast, Fivetran’s dependence on external tools for data transformation and its complex, volume-based pricing model can lead to higher expenses and greater resource demands, particularly for businesses that require extensive customization and control over their data workflows.
Our most popular data sources
Select the tools you need data from and start syncing your data now.
Why choose Weld?
Gather all your data in one place
Spend less time on manual reporting
Reliability and quality
Combine and transform your data with AI
Award winning ETL Platform
Across industries, data-driven companies choose Weld to sync their data seamlessly








Get started with Weld
Spend less time managing data and more time getting real insights.