Comparing Dell Boomi with FME and Weld



What is Dell Boomi
Pros
- 200+ connectors for SaaS, on-prem, and big data sources.
- Cloud-native or on-prem Atom runtime allows hybrid deployments.
- Visual process designer with drag-and-drop mapping, enriched by shape-specific logic (e.g., function, decision, loop).
- Built-in error handling, version control, and CI/CD integration.
Cons
- Costly licensing structure (per-connection, per-Atom), which can escalate for high throughput or many connectors.
- Complex transformations sometimes still require scripting (JavaScript/Groovy), reducing low-code benefits for advanced scenarios.
- Learning curve: mastering Atoms, Molecules, and hybrid architecture requires time, particularly for non-technical users.
Dell Boomi Documentation:
What I like about Dell Boomi
Boomi’s AtomSphere makes deploying integration processes easy—Atommachines can run anywhere (cloud or on-prem), and the visual interface is intuitive for building mappings.
What I dislike about Dell Boomi
Licensing can be expensive, especially for high-volume data. Complex integrations can require coding despite the low-code promise.
What is FME
Pros
- Supports 450+ data formats, making it ideal for GIS and non-GIS integration.
- Graphical Workspaces with extensive transformer library for spatial (coordinate reprojection, topology) and non-spatial transformations (joins, data cleansing).
- FME Server enables automated scheduling, breakout clustered processing, and REST API for triggering workflows.
- Strong data validation and quality features—users can apply conditional checks and notifications when data doesn’t meet criteria.
Cons
- High licensing costs for desktop (FME Desktop) and server components; often priced per core for server deployments.
- Primarily geared toward GIS/spatial use cases; non-spatial ETL use is possible but the interface and transformers are optimized for spatial workflows.
- Large learning curve for complex workspaces—dragging many transformers can become unwieldy visually.
FME Product Overview:
What I like about FME
FME’s ability to handle complex spatial transformations and 450+ formats is unmatched. The drag-and-drop workspace builder drastically speeds up geospatial ETL.
What I dislike about FME
Licensing can be expensive for smaller organizations. Focus on spatial means some general ETL features are less polished than GIS-specific functions.
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Ease of Use & Interface
Dell Boomi
Boomi’s Integration Builder uses a web-based canvas to create process flows. Connectors and maps are configured via dialogs. Error-handling, version control, and deployment controls are integrated. Some users find building very complex workflows cumbersome despite the visual design.
FME
FME’s Workbench is a desktop application where users connect Reader and Writer transformers to map and transform data. While powerful for spatial, the GUI can feel cluttered for workflows with hundreds of transformers.
Pricing & Affordability
Dell Boomi
Boomi’s pricing is multi-faceted—permanent Atom licenses, per-connection pricing, and usage-based charges for transactions. SMBs may need to request custom quotes to stay within budget.
FME
FME Desktop licenses start around $2,000/year. FME Server pricing is per-core (often $20k+/core for an annual license). Expensive for small teams, but justified where spatial data integration is critical.
Feature Set
Dell Boomi
Features: ETL/ELT processes, API management, EDI/B2B integration, workflow automation, data quality, and master data management. It also offers training, community forums, and professional services.
FME
Supports reading/writing 450+ formats (GIS, CAD, JSON, XML, databases), transformer library (spatial & non-spatial), workflow orchestration via FME Server, automation (event-based, scheduled), and REST API endpoints for triggering.
Flexibility & Customization
Dell Boomi
Custom scripting is supported via Groovy or JavaScript for complex transforms. Atoms can be deployed virtually anywhere for hybrid use cases. However, you rely on Boomi for core engine updates; it’s not open-source.
FME
Users can embed Python, R, or Shell scripts within transformers for custom logic. FME Server can be deployed in any environment (on-prem, AWS, Azure) and scaled horizontally. However, no built-in data catalog or lineage; separate tools needed.
Summary of Dell Boomi vs FME vs Weld
Weld | Dell Boomi | FME | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 200+ | 200+ | 450+ |
Price | $79 / No data volume limits | Subscription-based (per Atom/connection; starts ~$1000/month) | Per-seat for FME Desktop ($2,000+/year) and per-core for FME Server (custom) |
Free tier | No | No | No |
Location | EU | Austin, TX, USA | Surrey, BC, Canada (Safe Software HQ) |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | Yes | No |
Transformations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
On-Premise | No | Yes | Yes |
Orchestration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Lineage | Yes | Yes | No |
Version control | Yes | Yes | No |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | Yes | No |
dbt Core Integration | Yes | No | No |
dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | Yes | Yes |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.3 | 4.7 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing Dell Boomi, FME, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- Dell Boomi: features: etl/elt processes, api management, edi/b2b integration, workflow automation, data quality, and master data management. it also offers training, community forums, and professional services. . boomi’s pricing is multi-faceted—permanent atom licenses, per-connection pricing, and usage-based charges for transactions. smbs may need to request custom quotes to stay within budget. .
- FME: supports reading/writing 450+ formats (gis, cad, json, xml, databases), transformer library (spatial & non-spatial), workflow orchestration via fme server, automation (event-based, scheduled), and rest api endpoints for triggering. . fme desktop licenses start around $2,000/year. fme server pricing is per-core (often $20k+/core for an annual license). expensive for small teams, but justified where spatial data integration is critical. .
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at $99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..