Comparing Azure Data Factory with Skyvia and Weld



What is Azure Data Factory
Pros
- 90+ built-in connectors (Azure SQL, Cosmos DB, SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, etc.) and support for custom REST endpoints.
- Visual pipeline orchestration with debug, parameterization, and Git integration for CI/CD.
- Hybrid data integration via Self-hosted Integration Runtime for on-premises sources.
- Integration with Azure Synapse, Databricks, and Azure Functions for flexible transformation and compute.
Cons
- Complex pricing: charges per pipeline activity, per DIU for data flows, and for data movement across regions.
- UI can be slow when working with large pipelines; error messages are often generic, requiring deeper investigation.
- Steeper learning curve for advanced features (e.g., mapping data flows with Spark under the hood).
Azure Data Factory Documentation:
What I like about Azure Data Factory
ADF’s visual pipeline authoring and integration with other Azure services (Databricks, Synapse) make it easy to build end-to-end data workflows without managing infrastructure.
What I dislike about Azure Data Factory
Pricing is multifaceted (per activity run, data movement, SSIS integration), which can be hard to forecast. Debugging pipeline errors often requires sifting through activity logs.
What is Skyvia
Pros
- Fast, no-code setup for loading data from 70+ sources to warehouses or cloud DBs.
- Handles incremental loads and can auto-detect schema changes for many sources.
- Built-in data replication (one-way sync) and backup options for cloud data.
- Free tier available (limited rows and sources) for basic usage.
Cons
- No advanced transformation engine—only simple filters, mappings, and formula fields.
- Pricing based on rows and connectors; high-volume loads can be costly.
- Support and community resources are limited compared to major ETL vendors.
Skyvia Pricing:
What I like about Skyvia
Skyvia’s simple UI makes setting up data imports from Salesforce to BigQuery a few minutes’ work—no code needed, and minor schema changes auto-managed.
What I dislike about Skyvia
Limited transformation capabilities; you can only apply basic filters or field mappings. For complex transformations, you need downstream tools.
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Ease of Use & Interface
Azure Data Factory
ADF’s UI provides a canvas for building pipelines and data flows. Basic data movement is intuitive, but advanced mapping data flows (visual Spark transformations) require understanding Spark concepts. Integration with Git makes collaboration easier.
Skyvia
Skyvia’s wizard-driven UI guides users through connecting source and destination, selecting objects, and scheduling. For basic use cases, it’s extremely quick. Complex pipelines aren’t its focus.
Pricing & Affordability
Azure Data Factory
ADF charges per pipeline activity (at least $0.25/activity), per DIU-hour for data flows, plus data movement costs (e.g., $0.25/GB). Estimating costs can be tricky due to these components, but pay-as-you-go avoids upfront fees.
Skyvia
Free tier allows up to 5000 rows/day. Paid plans start at $15/month for 10k rows plus $15 per additional 10k rows. For large-scale or continuous replication, costs scale accordingly.
Feature Set
Azure Data Factory
Features include: pipeline orchestration, mapping data flows (visual Spark jobs), hybrid integration via self-hosted runtime, triggers (schedule, event, tumbling window), monitoring & alerting, and integration with Azure Monitor. Also supports SSIS lift-and-shift for on-prem ETL workloads.
Skyvia
Supports: one-time or scheduled imports/exports, incremental loads (via key-based changes), data backup/restore, and firewall-friendly connectors. No transformations beyond mappings/filters.
Flexibility & Customization
Azure Data Factory
ADF allows custom .NET activities, Azure Functions, and Databricks notebooks within pipelines. It supports parameterized templates, branching, and custom Azure ML scoring steps. However, customization often requires familiarity with other Azure services.
Skyvia
Users can define simple formulas for fields (e.g., concatenation). For advanced transformations, they need external tools (e.g., dbt) after loading. No support for scripting within ETL.
Summary of Azure Data Factory vs Skyvia vs Weld
Weld | Azure Data Factory | Skyvia | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 200+ | 90+ | 70+ |
Price | $79 / No data volume limits | Pay per activity run + data movement; starts ~$0.25 per DIU-hour for data flows | Free (limited); paid plans from $15/month for 10k rows |
Free tier | No | Yes | Yes |
Location | EU | Azure Global (multi-region) | San Francisco, CA, USA |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No | No |
Transformations | Yes | Yes | No |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
On-Premise | No | No | No |
Orchestration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Lineage | Yes | Yes | No |
Version control | Yes | Yes | No |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | No |
dbt Core Integration | Yes | No | No |
dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | No | No |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing Azure Data Factory, Skyvia, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- Azure Data Factory: features include: pipeline orchestration, mapping data flows (visual spark jobs), hybrid integration via self-hosted runtime, triggers (schedule, event, tumbling window), monitoring & alerting, and integration with azure monitor. also supports ssis lift-and-shift for on-prem etl workloads. . adf charges per pipeline activity (at least $0.25/activity), per diu-hour for data flows, plus data movement costs (e.g., $0.25/gb). estimating costs can be tricky due to these components, but pay-as-you-go avoids upfront fees. .
- Skyvia: supports: one-time or scheduled imports/exports, incremental loads (via key-based changes), data backup/restore, and firewall-friendly connectors. no transformations beyond mappings/filters. . free tier allows up to 5000 rows/day. paid plans start at $15/month for 10k rows plus $15 per additional 10k rows. for large-scale or continuous replication, costs scale accordingly. .
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at $99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..