Comparing Azure Data Factory with Google Cloud Dataflow and Weld
Carolina Russ6 min read
What is Azure Data Factory
Azure Data Factory (ADF) is Microsoft’s cloud-based data integration service for creating ETL/ELT pipelines. ADF supports a drag-and-drop pipeline designer, over 90 built-in connectors for Azure, on-premises, and SaaS data sources, and can execute transformations via Azure Databricks, U-SQL, or stored procedures. It also includes features for data orchestration, monitoring, and hybrid data integration scenarios.
Pros
- 90+ built-in connectors (Azure SQL, Cosmos DB, SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, etc.) and support for custom REST endpoints.
- Visual pipeline orchestration with debug, parameterization, and Git integration for CI/CD.
- Hybrid data integration via Self-hosted Integration Runtime for on-premises sources.
- Integration with Azure Synapse, Databricks, and Azure Functions for flexible transformation and compute.
Cons
- Complex pricing: charges per pipeline activity, per DIU for data flows, and for data movement across regions.
- UI can be slow when working with large pipelines; error messages are often generic, requiring deeper investigation.
- Steeper learning curve for advanced features (e.g., mapping data flows with Spark under the hood).
Azure Data Factory Documentation:
What I like about Azure Data Factory
ADF’s visual pipeline authoring and integration with other Azure services (Databricks, Synapse) make it easy to build end-to-end data workflows without managing infrastructure.
What I dislike about Azure Data Factory
Pricing is multifaceted (per activity run, data movement, SSIS integration), which can be hard to forecast. Debugging pipeline errors often requires sifting through activity logs.
What is Google Cloud Dataflow
Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully managed stream and batch processing service based on Apache Beam. It enables users to write ETL pipelines in Java or Python, which Dataflow executes on Google’s serverless infrastructure with autoscaling. It integrates natively with Pub/Sub, BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and other GCP services for end-to-end data processing.
Pros
- Unified batch + streaming model via Apache Beam SDK (Java/Python).
- Serverless autoscaling with dynamic work rebalancing for cost and performance optimization.
- First-class integration with GCP services: Pub/Sub, BigQuery I/O connectors, Cloud Storage, Spanner, etc.
- Built-in exactly-once processing semantics and windowing capabilities for streaming ETL.
Cons
- Steep learning curve if unfamiliar with Apache Beam’s abstractions (PCollections, DoFns, pipelines).
- Monitoring and debugging streaming pipelines can be complex—metrics and logs often require cross-referencing.
- Cost can rise quickly for large-scale streaming (billed per vCPU-second and memory). Efficient pipeline tuning is critical.
Cloud Dataflow Documentation:
What I like about Google Cloud Dataflow
Dataflow’s unified model for batch and streaming simplifies pipeline development—write once and choose your execution mode. Autoscaling and dynamic work rebalancing ensure efficient resource use.
What I dislike about Google Cloud Dataflow
Debugging streaming jobs can be challenging; understanding Apache Beam semantics is essential. Costs can spike if pipelines aren’t carefully tuned.
What is Weld
Weld is a powerful ETL platform that seamlessly integrates ELT, data transformations, reverse ETL, and AI-assisted features into one user-friendly solution. With its intuitive interface, Weld makes it easy for anyone, regardless of technical expertise, to build and manage data workflows. Known for its premium quality connectors, all built in-house, Weld ensures the highest quality and reliability for its users. It is designed to handle large datasets with near real-time data synchronization, making it ideal for modern data teams that require robust and efficient data integration solutions. Weld also leverages AI to automate repetitive tasks, optimize workflows, and enhance data transformation capabilities, ensuring maximum efficiency and productivity. Users can combine data from a wide variety of sources, including marketing platforms, CRMs, e-commerce platforms like Shopify, APIs, databases, Excel, Google Sheets, and more, providing a single source of truth for all their data.
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Azure Data Factory vs Google Cloud Dataflow: Ease of Use and User Interface
Azure Data Factory
ADF’s UI provides a canvas for building pipelines and data flows. Basic data movement is intuitive, but advanced mapping data flows (visual Spark transformations) require understanding Spark concepts. Integration with Git makes collaboration easier.
Google Cloud Dataflow
Dataflow pipelines are defined programmatically in Java or Python (Apache Beam). There is no drag-and-drop UI; developers use the Cloud Console or CLI to monitor, but pipeline creation and debugging happen in code and SDKs.
Azure Data Factory vs Google Cloud Dataflow: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Azure Data Factory
ADF charges per pipeline activity (at least $0.25/activity), per DIU-hour for data flows, plus data movement costs (e.g., $0.25/GB). Estimating costs can be tricky due to these components, but pay-as-you-go avoids upfront fees.
Google Cloud Dataflow
Charges for each pipeline based on vCPU-second, memory, and persistent disk usage. Streaming jobs are billed continuously. Without careful optimization (autoscaling, batching), costs can escalate. However, for high-throughput workloads, serverless autoscaling can be cost-effective versus self-managed clusters.
Azure Data Factory vs Google Cloud Dataflow: Comprehensive Feature Set
Azure Data Factory
Features include: pipeline orchestration, mapping data flows (visual Spark jobs), hybrid integration via self-hosted runtime, triggers (schedule, event, tumbling window), monitoring & alerting, and integration with Azure Monitor. Also supports SSIS lift-and-shift for on-prem ETL workloads.
Google Cloud Dataflow
Features include: Batch & streaming unified model, windowing & triggers, exactly-once semantics, dynamic work rebalancing, and data-driven autoscaling. Supports FlexRS (spot pricing for batch) and integration with Dataflow SQL for SQL-based pipelines.
Azure Data Factory vs Google Cloud Dataflow: Flexibility and Customization
Azure Data Factory
ADF allows custom .NET activities, Azure Functions, and Databricks notebooks within pipelines. It supports parameterized templates, branching, and custom Azure ML scoring steps. However, customization often requires familiarity with other Azure services.
Google Cloud Dataflow
Users write custom transforms (ParDo, Map, GroupBy), can integrate UDFs, and use side inputs. Complex workloads requiring custom logic (stateful processing, custom connectors) are fully supported via Beam SDK. Cloud features like VPC, IAM, and KMS integrate security.
Summary of Azure Data Factory vs Google Cloud Dataflow vs Weld
| Weld | Azure Data Factory | Google Cloud Dataflow | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectors | 200++ | 90+ | 30+ |
| Price | €99 / Unlimited usage | Pay per activity run + data movement; starts ~$0.25 per DIU-hour for data flows | Per vCPU-second ($0.0106/vCPU-minute) + RAM and storage; streaming pipelines incur additional costs |
| Free tier | No | Yes | No |
| Location | EU | Azure Global (multi-region) | GCP Global (multi-region) |
| Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No | No |
| Transformations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
| On-Premise | No | No | No |
| Orchestration | Yes | Yes | No |
| Lineage | Yes | Yes | No |
| Version control | Yes | Yes | No |
| Load data to and from Excel | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
| Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | No |
| dbt Core Integration | Yes | No | No |
| dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
| OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | No | No |
| G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing Azure Data Factory, Google Cloud Dataflow, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- Azure Data Factory: features include: pipeline orchestration, mapping data flows (visual spark jobs), hybrid integration via self-hosted runtime, triggers (schedule, event, tumbling window), monitoring & alerting, and integration with azure monitor. also supports ssis lift-and-shift for on-prem etl workloads. . adf charges per pipeline activity (at least $0.25/activity), per diu-hour for data flows, plus data movement costs (e.g., $0.25/gb). estimating costs can be tricky due to these components, but pay-as-you-go avoids upfront fees. .
- Google Cloud Dataflow: features include: batch & streaming unified model, windowing & triggers, exactly-once semantics, dynamic work rebalancing, and data-driven autoscaling. supports flexrs (spot pricing for batch) and integration with dataflow sql for sql-based pipelines. . charges for each pipeline based on vcpu-second, memory, and persistent disk usage. streaming jobs are billed continuously. without careful optimization (autoscaling, batching), costs can escalate. however, for high-throughput workloads, serverless autoscaling can be cost-effective versus self-managed clusters. .
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at €99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..
