Comparing AWS Glue with Matillion and Weld
Carolina Russ6 min read
What is AWS Glue
AWS Glue is a fully managed, serverless ETL service from AWS that automates data discovery, cataloging, and transformation using the Glue Data Catalog and PySpark. It integrates natively with AWS services like S3, Redshift, RDS, and DynamoDB, and supports third-party sources via JDBC. Glue offers both batch and streaming ETL, along with visual tools like Glue Studio and low-code options like DataBrew. It automatically scales based on workload, supports job scheduling and orchestration, and provides monitoring through CloudWatch. Ideal for AWS-centric teams, Glue simplifies large-scale data integration with minimal infrastructure management.
Pros
- Serverless, no infrastructure to manage; Glue provisions compute as needed (Apache Spark under the hood).
- Built-in Data Catalog for schema discovery, versioning, and integration with Athena and Redshift Spectrum.
- Supports Python (PySpark) and Scala ETL scripts with mapping and transformation APIs for complex logic.
- Deep integration with AWS ecosystem (CloudWatch monitoring, IAM for security, S3 triggers).
Cons
- Cost can be unpredictable for long-running or high-concurrency jobs (billed per Data Processing Unit-hour).
- Debugging PySpark jobs in Glue requires jumping between AWS console logs and code; local testing is limited compared to local Spark.
- On-premises or multi-cloud data sources require additional setup (Glue has JDBC connectors but network config can be complex).
G2 Reviews:
What I like about AWS Glue
My team build a framework to fetch data from different platform through AWS Glue and stores them in S3 in the file format mention by us. That make our integration and fetching data a lot easier.
What I dislike about AWS Glue
Does not support xml file formats.
What is Matillion
Matillion is a cloud-native data integration platform that enables enterprises to build and manage ETL/ELT pipelines using a low-code, visual interface. Designed for cloud data warehouses like Snowflake, Redshift, and BigQuery, it allows users to extract, transform, and load data from various sources efficiently. With strong scheduling, orchestration, and monitoring features, Matillion is well-suited for handling complex workflows and large-scale data transformation needs.
Pros
- Large number of connectors
- Robust feature set
- Lots of advanced features for larger enterprises and data teams
- Has both ELT and ETL capabilities
- On premise options
Cons
- Expensive for small businesses
- Steep learning curve for non-technical users
- Requires a large upfront investment and implementation
A reviewer on G2 said::
What I like about Matillion
Built-in connectors to heaps of systems; ability to create custom connectors; active community and quick responses to forum questions
What I dislike about Matillion
Some components are a bit clunky; cloud version is not mature and lacks some features from the server-based version
What is Weld
Weld is a powerful ETL platform that seamlessly integrates ELT, data transformations, reverse ETL, and AI-assisted features into one user-friendly solution. With its intuitive interface, Weld makes it easy for anyone, regardless of technical expertise, to build and manage data workflows. Known for its premium quality connectors, all built in-house, Weld ensures the highest quality and reliability for its users. It is designed to handle large datasets with near real-time data synchronization, making it ideal for modern data teams that require robust and efficient data integration solutions. Weld also leverages AI to automate repetitive tasks, optimize workflows, and enhance data transformation capabilities, ensuring maximum efficiency and productivity. Users can combine data from a wide variety of sources, including marketing platforms, CRMs, e-commerce platforms like Shopify, APIs, databases, Excel, Google Sheets, and more, providing a single source of truth for all their data.
Pros
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- ETL + reverse ETL in one
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- Flat monthly pricing model
- 200+ connectors (Shopify, HubSpot, etc.)
- AI assistant
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
- Focused on cloud data warehouses
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Ease of Use & Interface
AWS Glue
AWS Glue Studio provides a visual job authoring interface where you can drag-and-drop nodes to transform data, but deeper customizations still require PySpark code. The console UI can be intimidating for new users.
Matillion
Matillion has a steep learning curve, especially for non-technical users, due to its robust feature set and advanced capabilities designed for larger enterprises.
Pricing & Affordability
AWS Glue
Glue charges per Data Processing Unit (DPU)-hour; for example, running a small job for one hour costs ~$0.44 * number of DPUs used. While serverless, large or long-running jobs can become costly if not optimized.
Matillion
Matillion's pricing can be expensive, particularly for small businesses, as it is based on credits and requires a significant upfront investment.
Feature Set
AWS Glue
Features include automated schema discovery (Glue Data Catalog), PySpark/Scala job generation, job scheduling & triggers, DataBrew for visual data prep, and Glue Workflows for orchestration. Also supports streaming ETL via Glue streaming jobs.
Matillion
Matillion offers a robust set of features with support for both ETL and ELT, along with numerous connectors and on-premise options, making it ideal for large enterprises with complex data needs.
Flexibility & Customization
AWS Glue
Glue allows custom PySpark scripts, supports Python libraries via wheel files, and you can integrate with AWS Lambda for custom triggers. However, debugging and local runs can be challenging compared to self-managed Spark.
Matillion
Matillion provides extensive customization and flexibility options, particularly for large enterprises, but may be overkill for smaller teams or simpler use cases.
Summary of AWS Glue vs Matillion vs Weld
| Weld | AWS Glue | Matillion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectors | 200+ | 50+ | 110+ |
| Price | $79 / 5M Active Rows | $0.44 per DPUs-hour (development endpoints) + per-job costs | $2.00 per credit |
| Free tier | No | Yes | Yes |
| Location | EU | AWS Global (multi-region) | UK |
| Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No | Yes |
| Transformations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
| On-Premise | No | No | Yes |
| Orchestration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Lineage | Yes | Yes | No |
| Version control | Yes | No | No |
| Load data to and from Excel | Yes | Yes | No |
| Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
| Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | No |
| dbt Core Integration | Yes | Yes | No |
| dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
| OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | No | Yes |
| G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.1 | 4.3 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing AWS Glue, Matillion, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- AWS Glue: features include automated schema discovery (glue data catalog), pyspark/scala job generation, job scheduling & triggers, databrew for visual data prep, and glue workflows for orchestration. also supports streaming etl via glue streaming jobs. . glue charges per data processing unit (dpu)-hour; for example, running a small job for one hour costs ~$0.44 * number of dpus used. while serverless, large or long-running jobs can become costly if not optimized. .
- Matillion: matillion offers a robust set of features with support for both etl and elt, along with numerous connectors and on-premise options, making it ideal for large enterprises with complex data needs.. matillion's pricing can be expensive, particularly for small businesses, as it is based on credits and requires a significant upfront investment..
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at $79 for 5 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..
