Comparing Alooma with Google Cloud Dataflow and Weld
Carolina Russ6 min read
What is Alooma
Alooma (acquired by Google Cloud in 2019) was a streaming ETL platform that enabled real-time ingestion of data from various sources into BigQuery. It provided a visual pipeline editor to map, transform, and route data with minimal code, automatically handling schema changes and ensuring exactly-once delivery. While Alooma as a standalone product is retired, many of its features have been integrated into Google Cloud’s Dataflow and Pub/Sub pipelines.
Pros
- Real-time streaming ETL with automatic schema drift handling.
- Minimal coding: visual pipeline UI with built-in connectors to databases, Kafka, APIs, and SaaS apps.
- Exactly-once delivery guarantees to BigQuery, eliminating duplicate data.
Cons
- Standalone Alooma product is discontinued—functionality now lives in GCP services (e.g., Dataflow, Data Fusion).
- Migrating legacy Alooma pipelines to GCP-native services requires rework, as UI and features differ from original Alooma.
Google Cloud’s Dataflow (Alooma integration):
What I like about Alooma
Alooma’s ease of connecting live streaming data sources directly into BigQuery with automated schema management was revolutionary for our real-time analytics.
What I dislike about Alooma
Since Google integrated Alooma into its native services, the standalone product no longer exists, so new users must migrate to Dataflow or Data Fusion.
What is Google Cloud Dataflow
Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully managed stream and batch processing service based on Apache Beam. It enables users to write ETL pipelines in Java or Python, which Dataflow executes on Google’s serverless infrastructure with autoscaling. It integrates natively with Pub/Sub, BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and other GCP services for end-to-end data processing.
Pros
- Unified batch + streaming model via Apache Beam SDK (Java/Python).
- Serverless autoscaling with dynamic work rebalancing for cost and performance optimization.
- First-class integration with GCP services: Pub/Sub, BigQuery I/O connectors, Cloud Storage, Spanner, etc.
- Built-in exactly-once processing semantics and windowing capabilities for streaming ETL.
Cons
- Steep learning curve if unfamiliar with Apache Beam’s abstractions (PCollections, DoFns, pipelines).
- Monitoring and debugging streaming pipelines can be complex—metrics and logs often require cross-referencing.
- Cost can rise quickly for large-scale streaming (billed per vCPU-second and memory). Efficient pipeline tuning is critical.
Cloud Dataflow Documentation:
What I like about Google Cloud Dataflow
Dataflow’s unified model for batch and streaming simplifies pipeline development—write once and choose your execution mode. Autoscaling and dynamic work rebalancing ensure efficient resource use.
What I dislike about Google Cloud Dataflow
Debugging streaming jobs can be challenging; understanding Apache Beam semantics is essential. Costs can spike if pipelines aren’t carefully tuned.
What is Weld
Weld is a powerful ETL platform that seamlessly integrates ELT, data transformations, reverse ETL, and AI-assisted features into one user-friendly solution. With its intuitive interface, Weld makes it easy for anyone, regardless of technical expertise, to build and manage data workflows. Known for its premium quality connectors, all built in-house, Weld ensures the highest quality and reliability for its users. It is designed to handle large datasets with near real-time data synchronization, making it ideal for modern data teams that require robust and efficient data integration solutions. Weld also leverages AI to automate repetitive tasks, optimize workflows, and enhance data transformation capabilities, ensuring maximum efficiency and productivity. Users can combine data from a wide variety of sources, including marketing platforms, CRMs, e-commerce platforms like Shopify, APIs, databases, Excel, Google Sheets, and more, providing a single source of truth for all their data.
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Alooma vs Google Cloud Dataflow: Ease of Use and User Interface
Alooma
Alooma’s web-based pipeline builder allowed users to drag-and-drop connectors for streaming or batch data, apply transformations, and route data to BigQuery with just a few clicks. The interface auto-generated SQL when possible.
Google Cloud Dataflow
Dataflow pipelines are defined programmatically in Java or Python (Apache Beam). There is no drag-and-drop UI; developers use the Cloud Console or CLI to monitor, but pipeline creation and debugging happen in code and SDKs.
Alooma vs Google Cloud Dataflow: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Alooma
No longer available as a separate product. Users adopt equivalent GCP services (Dataflow, Data Fusion) which have pay-as-you-go pricing under the GCP pricing model.
Google Cloud Dataflow
Charges for each pipeline based on vCPU-second, memory, and persistent disk usage. Streaming jobs are billed continuously. Without careful optimization (autoscaling, batching), costs can escalate. However, for high-throughput workloads, serverless autoscaling can be cost-effective versus self-managed clusters.
Alooma vs Google Cloud Dataflow: Comprehensive Feature Set
Alooma
Alooma supported real-time ingestion from Kafka, databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL), logs, REST APIs, and SaaS apps, with built-in transformations (masking, enrichment). It automatically handled schema changes, and could write to BigQuery partitions.
Google Cloud Dataflow
Features include: Batch & streaming unified model, windowing & triggers, exactly-once semantics, dynamic work rebalancing, and data-driven autoscaling. Supports FlexRS (spot pricing for batch) and integration with Dataflow SQL for SQL-based pipelines.
Alooma vs Google Cloud Dataflow: Flexibility and Customization
Alooma
Users could write custom JavaScript transforms or Python UDFs for complex logic. The platform managed infrastructure, but custom connectors required Eloqua code or support.
Google Cloud Dataflow
Users write custom transforms (ParDo, Map, GroupBy), can integrate UDFs, and use side inputs. Complex workloads requiring custom logic (stateful processing, custom connectors) are fully supported via Beam SDK. Cloud features like VPC, IAM, and KMS integrate security.
Summary of Alooma vs Google Cloud Dataflow vs Weld
| Weld | Alooma | Google Cloud Dataflow | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectors | 200+ | 100+ | 30+ |
| Price | €99 / 2 connectors | N/A (product retired; GCP service pricing applies) | Per vCPU-second ($0.0106/vCPU-minute) + RAM and storage; streaming pipelines incur additional costs |
| Free tier | No | No | No |
| Location | EU | Sunnyvale, CA, USA (pre-acquisition) | GCP Global (multi-region) |
| Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No | No |
| Transformations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
| On-Premise | No | No | No |
| Orchestration | Yes | Yes | No |
| Lineage | Yes | No | No |
| Version control | Yes | No | No |
| Load data to and from Excel | Yes | No | Yes |
| Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
| Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | No |
| dbt Core Integration | Yes | No | No |
| dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
| OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | No | No |
| G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.5 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing Alooma, Google Cloud Dataflow, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- Alooma: alooma supported real-time ingestion from kafka, databases (mysql, postgresql), logs, rest apis, and saas apps, with built-in transformations (masking, enrichment). it automatically handled schema changes, and could write to bigquery partitions. . no longer available as a separate product. users adopt equivalent gcp services (dataflow, data fusion) which have pay-as-you-go pricing under the gcp pricing model. .
- Google Cloud Dataflow: features include: batch & streaming unified model, windowing & triggers, exactly-once semantics, dynamic work rebalancing, and data-driven autoscaling. supports flexrs (spot pricing for batch) and integration with dataflow sql for sql-based pipelines. . charges for each pipeline based on vcpu-second, memory, and persistent disk usage. streaming jobs are billed continuously. without careful optimization (autoscaling, batching), costs can escalate. however, for high-throughput workloads, serverless autoscaling can be cost-effective versus self-managed clusters. .
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at €99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..
