Comparing Airbyte with Integrate.io and Weld

What is Airbyte
Pros
- Open-source platform
- A really large number of connectors and destinations
- Easy deployment
- Managed cloud option
- Engineering-focused with advanced options to build your own connectors and features
- Has both ELT and Reverse ETL options
- Large community
Cons
- More suited for advanced teams
- Require more maintenance
- The quality of connectors can vary because of open-source
- High dependence on community
In a review from Confessions of a Data Guy, he shares::
What I like about Airbyte
If you don't have workloads that currently use DBT or fit well into that model, this probably isn’t the tool for you.
What I dislike about Airbyte
What is Integrate.io
Pros
- 100+ pre-built connectors covering both operational (reverse ETL) and analytical use cases
- Low-code visual pipeline builder with rich transformation expressions
- Supports hybrid deployments via secure agent for on-prem sources
- Unified platform for ETL, ELT, and reverse ETL
- Robust workflow orchestration and scheduling features
Cons
- Cloud-only SaaS (no fully on-prem option)
- UI can feel complex initially due to breadth of features
- Less polished transformation debugging compared to dedicated tools like Matillion
- Pricing can be high for small teams; custom quotes required
- Documentation sometimes lagging on newer features
Integrate.io Documentation:
What I like about Integrate.io
Integrate.io features 100+ pre-built connectors for the most popular sources and destinations. The platform allows users without coding skills to develop automated transformations, while also offering a native scripting language for nuanced operations.
What I dislike about Integrate.io
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Airbyte vs Integrate.io: Ease of Use and User Interface
Airbyte
Airbyte is an open-source platform that is easier for teams with strong coding skills but may be challenging for those without technical expertise, especially when building custom connectors.
Integrate.io
Integrate.io offers a drag-and-drop canvas for building pipelines, which is intuitive for new users but requires some ramp-up to master its full capabilities.
Airbyte vs Integrate.io: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Airbyte
Airbyte offers a flexible pricing model based on credits, but costs can add up depending on data volume, making it more suitable for teams that can optimize their usage.
Integrate.io
Pricing is customized and generally pitched as more affordable than enterprise competitors, but small businesses may find entry costs high without a free tier.
Airbyte vs Integrate.io: Comprehensive Feature Set
Airbyte
The platform supports a large number of connectors and destinations and is designed to work well with DBT and SQL, providing robust options for teams building a modern data stack.
Integrate.io
A breadth of features: ETL/ELT connectors, reverse ETL for operational syncs, built-in transformation expressions, API generation, and workflow automation. It also provides data governance tools like environment promotion.
Airbyte vs Integrate.io: Flexibility and Customization
Airbyte
Airbyte's open-source nature and customization options make it highly flexible for teams with the capability to maintain and build on the platform, but this flexibility comes with a higher maintenance burden.
Integrate.io
Integrate.io allows custom scripting (JavaScript or SQL) within pipelines and secure agent deployment for on-prem sources. Its API and SDK enable integration into CI/CD, but ultimate customization is bounded by the platform’s framework.
Summary of Airbyte vs Integrate.io vs Weld
Weld | Airbyte | Integrate.io | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 200+ | 350+ | 100+ |
Price | €99 / 2 connectors | €2.50/credit (one million rows = 6 credits; 1 GB = 4 credits) | Custom, based on connectors & volume |
Free tier | No | Yes | No |
Location | EU | US | US |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Transformations | Yes | No | Yes |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
On-Premise | No | Yes | No |
Orchestration | Yes | No | Yes |
Lineage | Yes | No | No |
Version control | Yes | No | No |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | No | No |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | Yes |
dbt Core Integration | Yes | Yes | No |
dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | Yes | Yes |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing Airbyte, Integrate.io, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- Airbyte: the platform supports a large number of connectors and destinations and is designed to work well with dbt and sql, providing robust options for teams building a modern data stack.. airbyte offers a flexible pricing model based on credits, but costs can add up depending on data volume, making it more suitable for teams that can optimize their usage..
- Integrate.io: a breadth of features: etl/elt connectors, reverse etl for operational syncs, built-in transformation expressions, api generation, and workflow automation. it also provides data governance tools like environment promotion.. pricing is customized and generally pitched as more affordable than enterprise competitors, but small businesses may find entry costs high without a free tier..
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at €99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..