Comparing Airbyte with Estuary and Weld


What is Airbyte
Pros
- Open-source platform
- A really large number of connectors and destinations
- Easy deployment
- Managed cloud option
- Engineering-focused with advanced options to build your own connectors and features
- Has both ELT and Reverse ETL options
- Large community
Cons
- More suited for advanced teams
- Require more maintenance
- The quality of connectors can vary because of open-source
- High dependence on community
In a review from Confessions of a Data Guy, he shares::
What I like about Airbyte
If you don't have workloads that currently use DBT or fit well into that model, this probably isn’t the tool for you.
What I dislike about Airbyte
What is Estuary
Pros
- Purpose-built for real-time CDC and streaming ETL with sub-100ms latency.
- Automatic schema evolution with exactly-once delivery guarantees.
- 200+ no-code connectors for databases, SaaS apps, and message queues.
- Flexible deployment: public cloud, private cloud, or self-hosted (BYOC).
Cons
- Premium pricing model ($0.50/GB consumed + connector fees) can be expensive for small teams.
- Still growing connector catalog; niche or very new APIs may require custom work.
- Smaller community compared to older open-source tools, meaning fewer community-built resources.
Estuary Pricing Page:
What I like about Estuary
Estuary’s real-time, no-code model is magical—getting data instantly with minimal effort and near-zero pipeline maintenance. Plus, their support is fantastic.
What I dislike about Estuary
Pricing can be high for lower-volume teams, and some less-common connectors are still in development, which limits immediate use cases for niche sources.
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Airbyte vs Estuary: Ease of Use and User Interface
Airbyte
Airbyte is an open-source platform that is easier for teams with strong coding skills but may be challenging for those without technical expertise, especially when building custom connectors.
Estuary
Estuary’s UI is intuitive: users can add connectors, configure CDC streams, and specify destinations in a few clicks. Complex transformations can be written in SQL or TypeScript directly in the Flow editor, but most tasks are handled via no-code connectors.
Airbyte vs Estuary: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Airbyte
Airbyte offers a flexible pricing model based on credits, but costs can add up depending on data volume, making it more suitable for teams that can optimize their usage.
Estuary
While Estuary provides a 10 GB/month free tier and a 30-day trial, its consumption-based pricing ($0.50/GB + connector fees) can become costly at scale. Teams processing hundreds of GBs per month should budget accordingly.
Airbyte vs Estuary: Comprehensive Feature Set
Airbyte
The platform supports a large number of connectors and destinations and is designed to work well with DBT and SQL, providing robust options for teams building a modern data stack.
Estuary
Key features include real-time CDC (sub-100ms latency), batch and streaming pipelines, automated schema evolution, and in-stream or post-load transformations via SQL/TypeScript or dbt. It also supports Kafka-compatibility and private storage for data replay.
Airbyte vs Estuary: Flexibility and Customization
Airbyte
Airbyte's open-source nature and customization options make it highly flexible for teams with the capability to maintain and build on the platform, but this flexibility comes with a higher maintenance burden.
Estuary
Estuary allows custom TypeScript transforms in-stream or SQL in-destination. Pipelines can be managed via CLI (flowctl) and integrated into CI/CD. While most connectors are no-code, custom connectors can be built using the open-source Flow SDK.
Summary of Airbyte vs Estuary vs Weld
Weld | Airbyte | Estuary | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 200++ | 350+ | 200+ |
Price | $99 / Unlimited usage | $2.50/credit (one million rows = 6 credits; 1 GB = 4 credits) | $0.50/GB consumed + per-connector fee |
Free tier | No | Yes | Yes |
Location | EU | US | New York, NY, USA |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | Yes | No |
Transformations | Yes | No | Yes |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
On-Premise | No | Yes | Yes |
Orchestration | Yes | No | Yes |
Lineage | Yes | No | Yes |
Version control | Yes | No | Yes |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | No | No |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | Yes |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | No |
dbt Core Integration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | Yes | Yes |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.8 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing Airbyte, Estuary, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- Airbyte: the platform supports a large number of connectors and destinations and is designed to work well with dbt and sql, providing robust options for teams building a modern data stack.. airbyte offers a flexible pricing model based on credits, but costs can add up depending on data volume, making it more suitable for teams that can optimize their usage..
- Estuary: key features include real-time cdc (sub-100ms latency), batch and streaming pipelines, automated schema evolution, and in-stream or post-load transformations via sql/typescript or dbt. it also supports kafka-compatibility and private storage for data replay. . while estuary provides a 10 gb/month free tier and a 30-day trial, its consumption-based pricing ($0.50/gb + connector fees) can become costly at scale. teams processing hundreds of gbs per month should budget accordingly. .
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at $99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..