Comparing 5X with FME and Weld



What is 5X
Pros
- 500+ connectors for both source and destination (data warehouses, SaaS apps, ad platforms, etc.).
- Includes managed Snowflake/BigQuery warehouse, dbt core integration for transformations, and reverse ETL to push data back to apps—all in one platform.
- Built-in BI layer and semantic metric definitions so you can build dashboards without a separate BI tool.
- Dedicated in-house data experts provide consulting and implementation support, accelerating time-to-value.
Cons
- Premium pricing (Starter ~$500/mo, scaling with connectors/warehouse usage) can be high for small teams.
- Being a newer startup, the community and third-party tutorials are limited; some advanced features are still maturing.
- Heavily opinionated stack—if you use an alternate data warehouse or BI tool, integration can require workarounds.
5X Testimonials:
What I like about 5X
5X’s all-in-one stack reduced our tool sprawl: data ingested, transformed, and even dashboards were live in days. Their in-house experts helped us onboard quickly.
What I dislike about 5X
As a relatively new entrant, some advanced features (e.g., AI-driven pipeline suggestions) are still in beta, and pricing can scale up quickly with heavy usage.
What is FME
Pros
- Supports 450+ data formats, making it ideal for GIS and non-GIS integration.
- Graphical Workspaces with extensive transformer library for spatial (coordinate reprojection, topology) and non-spatial transformations (joins, data cleansing).
- FME Server enables automated scheduling, breakout clustered processing, and REST API for triggering workflows.
- Strong data validation and quality features—users can apply conditional checks and notifications when data doesn’t meet criteria.
Cons
- High licensing costs for desktop (FME Desktop) and server components; often priced per core for server deployments.
- Primarily geared toward GIS/spatial use cases; non-spatial ETL use is possible but the interface and transformers are optimized for spatial workflows.
- Large learning curve for complex workspaces—dragging many transformers can become unwieldy visually.
FME Product Overview:
What I like about FME
FME’s ability to handle complex spatial transformations and 450+ formats is unmatched. The drag-and-drop workspace builder drastically speeds up geospatial ETL.
What I dislike about FME
Licensing can be expensive for smaller organizations. Focus on spatial means some general ETL features are less polished than GIS-specific functions.
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Ease of Use & Interface
5X
5X’s UI guides users through onboard: connect sources, choose warehouse, define dbt models, and build dashboards—all via a low-code interface. Non-technical users can leverage pre-packaged templates, while power users can write custom SQL/dbt.
FME
FME’s Workbench is a desktop application where users connect Reader and Writer transformers to map and transform data. While powerful for spatial, the GUI can feel cluttered for workflows with hundreds of transformers.
Pricing & Affordability
5X
5X offers a Free Forever tier for small usage (limited connectors/rows). The Starter plan (~$500/mo) covers basic use, but costs increase with data volume and connector count. ROI calculations often justify the cost by consolidating multiple tools.
FME
FME Desktop licenses start around $2,000/year. FME Server pricing is per-core (often $20k+/core for an annual license). Expensive for small teams, but justified where spatial data integration is critical.
Feature Set
5X
End-to-end features: ETL ingestion (500+ connectors), managed warehouse provisioning, dbt transformations, reverse ETL, built-in BI/visualization, and a semantic layer. It also includes lineage tracking and API endpoints for data apps.
FME
Supports reading/writing 450+ formats (GIS, CAD, JSON, XML, databases), transformer library (spatial & non-spatial), workflow orchestration via FME Server, automation (event-based, scheduled), and REST API endpoints for triggering.
Flexibility & Customization
5X
While 5X is tightly integrated, it allows custom dbt models, Python UDFs, and can ingest data from arbitrary APIs. If you don’t need the BI layer, you can skip that component. Custom connectors can be built upon request by their team.
FME
Users can embed Python, R, or Shell scripts within transformers for custom logic. FME Server can be deployed in any environment (on-prem, AWS, Azure) and scaled horizontally. However, no built-in data catalog or lineage; separate tools needed.
Summary of 5X vs FME vs Weld
Weld | 5X | FME | |
---|---|---|---|
Connectors | 200+ | 500+ | 450+ |
Price | $79 / No data volume limits | Free Forever tier; Starter ~$500/month for limited usage, then scales with volume | Per-seat for FME Desktop ($2,000+/year) and per-core for FME Server (custom) |
Free tier | No | Yes | No |
Location | EU | Singapore (HQ) + USA, UK, India | Surrey, BC, Canada (Safe Software HQ) |
Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | Yes | No |
Transformations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
AI Assistant | Yes | No | No |
On-Premise | No | No | Yes |
Orchestration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Lineage | Yes | Yes | No |
Version control | Yes | Yes | No |
Load data to and from Excel | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | Yes | No |
Two-Way Sync | Yes | Yes | No |
dbt Core Integration | Yes | Yes | No |
dbt Cloud Integration | Yes | No | No |
OpenAPI / Developer API | Yes | No | Yes |
G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.7 |
Conclusion
You’re comparing 5X, FME, Weld. Each of these tools has its own strengths:
- 5X: end-to-end features: etl ingestion (500+ connectors), managed warehouse provisioning, dbt transformations, reverse etl, built-in bi/visualization, and a semantic layer. it also includes lineage tracking and api endpoints for data apps. . 5x offers a free forever tier for small usage (limited connectors/rows). the starter plan (~$500/mo) covers basic use, but costs increase with data volume and connector count. roi calculations often justify the cost by consolidating multiple tools. .
- FME: supports reading/writing 450+ formats (gis, cad, json, xml, databases), transformer library (spatial & non-spatial), workflow orchestration via fme server, automation (event-based, scheduled), and rest api endpoints for triggering. . fme desktop licenses start around $2,000/year. fme server pricing is per-core (often $20k+/core for an annual license). expensive for small teams, but justified where spatial data integration is critical. .
- Weld: weld integrates elt, data transformations, and reverse etl all within one platform. it also provides advanced features such as data lineage, orchestration, workflow management, and an ai assistant, which helps in automating repetitive tasks and optimizing workflows.. weld offers a straightforward and competitive pricing model, starting at $99 for 2 million active rows, making it more affordable and predictable, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises..