Comparing Funnel with Stitch and Weld
The future of data is here: effortlessly gather all your data in one place and use AI to drive insights.
No credit card required.
What is Funnel
Pros
- Great interface
- Requires little technical expertise
- Straightforward dashboard
- More than 500 data connectors
- Great onboarding and training
Cons
- Expensive and complex, especially for smaller businesses
- Limited advanced analytics
- Reporting features could be more robust
- Limited to marketing use cases
- Steep and long learning curve
A reviewer on G2:
What I like about Funnel
We use Funnel mostly for ingesting data into BigQuery. Using the native connectors is significantly more efficient than building a direct connection to the relevant APIs, particularly for Facebook / Meta data.
What I dislike about Funnel
Recently the price of the platform has gone up. Although it is still priced competitively vs its alternatives.
What is Stitch
Pros
- Easy to setup and use
- A cost-friendly pricing model that's easy to understand and based on usage
- Integrates with Talend
- Includes transformations with JSON
- Fully managed no-code ELT data pipelines
Cons
- Require deep technical knowledge to get full value out of the platform
- The quality can vary a lot between different connectors as they are not maintained by Stitch
- Depends on the Singer open source framework which can break without notice
A reviewer on Gartner said::
What I like about Stitch
Stitch is an affordable tool for bringing data "as is" from the various data sources (Google Ads, Salesforce or even MySQL) to a data warehouse (Redshift, Snowflake, BigQuery, etc.)
What I dislike about Stitch
What is Weld
Pros
- Premium quality connectors and reliability
- User-friendly and easy to set up
- AI assistant
- Very competitive and easy-to-understand pricing model
- Reverse ETL option
- Lineage, orchestration, and workflow features
- Advanced transformation and SQL modeling capabilities
- Ability to handle large datasets and near real-time data sync
- Combines data from a wide range of sources for a single source of truth
Cons
- Requires some technical knowledge around data warehousing and SQL
- Limited features for advanced data teams
A reviewer on G2 said:
What I like about Weld
First and foremost, Weld is incredibly user-friendly. The graphical interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to build data workflows quickly and efficiently. Even with little experience in SQL and pipeline management, we found that Weld was straightforward and easy to use. What really impressed me, however, was Weld's flexibility. It was able to handle data from a wide variety of sources, including SQL databases, Google Sheets, and even APIs. The solution also allowed us to customize my data transformations in a way that best suited my needs. Whether I needed to clean data, join tables, or aggregate data, Weld had the necessary tools to accomplish the task. Weld's performance was also exceptional. I was able to run large-scale ETL jobs quickly and efficiently, with minimal downtime via a Snowflake instance and visualization via own-hosted Metabase. The solution's scalability meant that I could process more data without any issues. Another standout feature of Weld was its support. I never felt lost or unsure about how to use a particular feature, as the support team was always quick to respond to any questions or concerns that I had. Overall, I highly recommend Weld as an ETL solution. Its user-friendliness, flexibility, performance, and support make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their data integration processes. I will definitely be using Weld for all my ETL needs going forward.
What I dislike about Weld
Weld is still limited to a certain number of integrations - although the team is super interested to hear if you need custom integrations.
Funnel vs Stitch: Ease of Use and User Interface
Funnel
Funnel.io is designed to be easy to use, with a straightforward dashboard that requires little technical expertise, making it accessible for marketers.
Stitch
Stitch is relatively easy to set up and use, offering no-code connectors and an affordable pricing model, but users may need deep technical knowledge to leverage its full potential.
Funnel vs Stitch: Pricing Transparency and Affordability
Funnel
Funnel.io's pricing can be complex and expensive, especially for smaller businesses, which might find it challenging to justify the cost for their needs. The platform operates on a flexpoints system, a type of consumption-based pricing, which can make it difficult for users to predict their monthly costs accurately.
Stitch
Stitch's pricing model is cost-friendly and based on usage, making it accessible for many users. However, costs can increase if data volumes grow significantly.
Funnel vs Stitch: Comprehensive Feature Set
Funnel
The platform offers over 500 data connectors and great onboarding and training, but its analytics capabilities may be limited for users needing more advanced features.
Stitch
Stitch offers fully managed no-code ELT data pipelines and integrates with Talend, but relies heavily on the Singer open-source framework, which can be less stable.
Funnel vs Stitch: Flexibility and Customization
Funnel
Funnel.io is limited to marketing use cases and may lack the flexibility needed for more comprehensive data operations, but is effective within its niche.
Stitch
Stitch is designed for simplicity and ease of use, but customization is limited and dependent on the capabilities of the open-source Singer framework.
Summary of Funnel vs Stitch vs Weld
| Weld | Funnel | Stitch | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectors | 150+ | 500+ | 140+ |
| Price | $99 / 2 connectors | €1.08 / flexpoint per month | $100 / 5M rows |
| Free tier | No | Yes | Yes |
| Extract data (ETL) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sync data to HubSpot, Salesforce, Klaviyo, Excel etc. (reverse ETL) | Yes | No | No |
| Version control | Yes | No | No |
| Orchestration | Yes | No | No |
| Lineage | Yes | No | No |
| AI Assistant | Yes | Yes | No |
| Load data to and from Excel | Yes | No | No |
| Load data to and from Google Sheets | Yes | No | No |
| Two-Way Sync | Yes | No | No |
| G2 Rating | 4.8 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Conclusion
When comparing Funnel.io with Weld, Weld emerges as a more comprehensive and customizable data integration platform. While Funnel.io provides a straightforward solution for marketing data, Weld's capabilities extend far beyond this scope. Weld's fully customizable platform is designed to handle a wide range of data sources and complex workflows, offering a true all-in-one solution. Additionally, Weld's AI capabilities significantly reduce the need for manual intervention, streamline data processes, and provide actionable insights, making it a highly efficient choice for businesses of all sizes. Furthermore, Funnel.io's pricing model, based on flexpoints, can be expensive and difficult to predict, which can be a disadvantage for businesses looking for cost transparency. For teams looking for a versatile tool that just works and can adapt to any data needs, Weld proves to be a superior alternative to Funnel.io, especially for those who need robust data integration capabilities and advanced automation features.
Our most popular data sources
Select the tools you need data from and start syncing your data now.
Why choose Weld?
Gather all your data in one place
Spend less time on manual reporting
Reliability and quality
Combine and transform your data with AI
Award winning ETL Platform
Across industries, data-driven companies choose Weld to sync their data seamlessly
Get started with Weld
Spend less time managing data and more time getting real insights.